The Start of Advertising in Media
More and more media is changing. Originally, books were the way information spread, then newspapers, and recently and explosion of communication technology has been the new trend. Many of these innovations go hand in hand with new technologies developed to sell products to consumers.

Radio was the first electronic communication device to widely use advertising, in a way we would recognize from today. Though it wasn’t always been like that. Radio was one of the first widely available ways for businesses to reach consumers in near real time. This was a game changer for many companies and in 1922 at the WEAF radio station in New York City, the first interruption ad was played on the air. It was an advertisement for apartments in Jackson Heights, Queens. It was bought for $50, and was the first advertisement over the airwaves in America.

After that ads have been a key part in many technologies used for communication today. From its inception Television had advertisements in mind. A way to actually show a consumer a product from the comfort of their own home. Programs were littered with sponsored content, from cigarettes to cleaning detergent. Ads would interrupt programs, forcing you to watch them to get to what consumers actually wanted to watch. As cynical as that last statement sounded its necessary, if television was entirely paid out of pocket by the viewer the quality of shows would drop dramatically and bill would increase by an astronomical amount. It allows consumers to get higher quality entertainment and media while also allowing businesses to perform an important aspect of their business.
Once ads like this became common place people began to get smarter. They knew the ads were just after the cash in their wallets and consumers became more resistant to the marketing they were seeing on their screens.
This, however, does not mean that advertisers have free reign over the air waves. Advertisements do not enjoy the same level of protected free speech as an individual or an artist. Advertisements are regulated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Regulations Were Quickly Made
The FTC was created in 1919 to protect consumers, “Protecting consumers and competition by preventing anti-competitive, deceptive, and unfair business practices through law enforcement, advocacy, and education without unduly burdening legitimate business activity.”
This prevents ads from deceiving consumers, making false claims, or simply lying to the public. By most everyone’s standards this is a good thing, as it protects consumers from the old timey snake oil salesmen. It keeps companies honest and allows consumers to choose products based on their merits and the quality of their advertising instead of on the lies the advertising propagates.
Frequently ads appear in journalism, it’s necessary to pay for the content that is created. People are less and less willing to pay this price themselves leaving advertisement to pick up the rest of the bill. In the world of content creation there is the idea that is frequently called “The Separation of Church and State” referring to the separation of the editorial side of news, and the business side of news. Due to this shift in where the money is coming from, these content creators are forced to pay more mind to the advertisers paying the bills that consumers aren’t willing to pay.
People Adapt to Advertisement
Flash forward to today, the world is filled with more ads than ever. The average person sees around 5000 ads a day compared to the 2000 they were seeing in 1977. Its not a secret that advertisements are everywhere, but they have begun to crop up in places that are beginning to concern creators, and consumers alike. Ads are being made to look like the content they are placed in. This is called native advertising, and it’s quickly becoming a massive cause for concern.

Native advertising is made to look like the content around it and to camouflage in as much as possible. Advertisers are starting to favor this method for a number of reasons. One of which being the ineffectiveness of traditional advertising on many consumers. According Webascender.com consumers only click on the average online banner ad 0.04% of the time, television ads 0.05%, and billboards only 0.03%. These numbers might be surprising to some based on how often you see these forms advertisements, but think about the last time you actually purchased something from one of these ads. The only times I can think of are billboards for food on a long road trip.
Native Advertising Takes Hold

This gives some context to the forces driving the recent boom in native advertising. This type of advertising helps to increase the likely-hood that a consumer will read the message advertisers create and allows the content creator to charge more for the service. This new method is coming at a cost to the consumer even though it might not be immediately apparent.

In 2014 Copyblogger.com held a survey with 2,088 participants, when they were asked “Do you know what native advertising is?” 49% responded “No. I have no idea” and 24% were “Hardly familiar with it”. This makes it clear that those getting targeted by native advertisements aren’t necessarily aware of what it is. That is dangerous for consumers. It is extremely important for those being subject to advertising to be aware of what is going on. Many in the survey were not as concerned about native advertisements being placed in publications such as Buzzfeed (Who regularly engage in this practice). But there was a cause for concern when the thought that news organizations such as the New York Times were put in the same position. The survey was split roughly 51% not that concerned, and 49% being more wary of the practice.
Many will argue that native advertising isn’t anything bad. News organizations are companies, and companies need to make a profit in order to keep running. This is a way for advertisers to gain more profits and help the company continue operating.
Ethical Usage of Native Advertising
Then the question is asked; is there a way to ethically use native advertising?
Many would say no, and point to things such as consumer confusion over the topic. Since consumers are not aware of the advertising method, it makes them susceptible to manipulation and deception. According to David Franklyn, most people don’t even see the “sponsored” label on much of this content.
This practice also raises concerns over conflict of interest. If companies such as the New York Times are sponsored by a company, would they be less willing to run a story that critiques or condemns that brand? One would hope that no, it has no impact but that would be an idealist and wholly unrealistic way to look at the issue.

There are even minor things to keep in mind, such as things like non-obvious benefits. Being able to control media that most people would assume as being unbiased gives a lot of power to those who use native advertising. In the Buzzfeed article listed above, Captain Morgan is included alongside a number of other notable historical figures. While Captain Morgan was a real person the company has a massive interest in keeping his image alive, and the memory of him preserved in a certain way. They might be less interested in people remembering him as a brutal plantation owner with numerous slaves than as a fun loving pirate who was just concerned with having a strong drink and good time. If someone was to read an native article published by that brand then the facts they learn might be a twisted version of reality.
While writing this piece it was difficult for me to keep my opinion as neutral as I was hoping to. Frankly, I think that native advertising is an exceptionally dangerous tactic to establish as an acceptable norm. It creates a break in the line between advertisements and content that I think it dangerous to leave open. The disclaimer that exists now doesn’t seem to be enough to inform people about the nature of the content they’re reading, and I personally feel that there either needs to be an overhaul of how this type of content is included in their hosting media sites or there need to exist set guidelines on how companies can use this type of marketing.
However, that is just my opinion and I would love to have my mind changed. So please let me know what you think in the comments.









